The objective of this test is to determine and compare the filtering efficiency between a Sentry Air Systems carbon filter cartridge and a Sentry Air Systems specially formulated formaldehyde filter (impregnated activated carbon) on formaldehyde vapors within a Sentry Air hood. An environment will be created that exceeds the OSHA Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL). Three separate tests will be run. A concentrated solution of formaldehyde will be used for each test. To determine the absorption ability of each filter on formaldehyde, the concentration of formaldehyde will be sampled at various locations in the lab. The samples will be obtained using sorbent tubes in air sampling pumps. The tubes will then be sent to the independent HIH laboratory for analysis.
1) Calibrate the sampling pumps: three at 200 ml/min and one at 50 ml/min.
2) Next, set up a SS-340-DCH with a 10 lb Activated Carbon filter. The 300 series unit with carbon filter generates approximately 200 CFM at full speed and the air velocity is greater than 100 FPM.
|40″ Ductless Fume Hood pictured above [Model SS-340-DCH]|
3) Measure 2 ml of a 37% solution of formaldehyde into a beaker and place underthe hood. Allow the formaldehyde to evaporate for 1 minute before turning on thehood and all the sampling pumps. Allow the formaldehyde to evaporate for 10minutes while the sampling pumps and the hood were running. The samplingpumps were placed under the hood, directly over the fan effluent, and at the otherend of the room, respectively. The pump used in the hood will absorb at a rate of 50 ml/min to minimize saturation of the sorbent tube.
4) The pumps located at the edge of the filter and the ambient air count will adsorb at 200 ml/min.
5) Immediately after 10 minutes of evaporation has taken place, cap the sorbent tubes, label properly and keep refrigerated.
6) Allow the room to air out completely before starting the next part of the experiment because this will affect the concentration of the next test.
7) Switch the filter combination in the hood by replacing the activated carbon with a formaldehyde carbon. Repeat the experiment as described above. Label the tubes and refrigerate.
8) Send results on dry ice to keep cool.
The sorbent tubes were analyzed by HIH Laboratory and the results were reported in the following table:
The results from the independent lab show that the formaldehyde vapors were removed from the airstream by both filters with greater than 99% efficiency. However, the results did not give an indication as to which filter, the activated carbon filter or the formaldehyde carbon filter, is more efficient for formaldehyde fumes. Had the test been significantly extended, it is likely that the operator would have been exposed to much greater than 0.08 ppm of formaldehyde fumes, whereas, the hood and filter would have prevented this exposure. Under the conditions present on the date of this test, the Sentry Air Systems ductless hood created a NIOSH compliant working environment for the operator and eliminated 99% of formaldehyde vapors from the airstream.
For a PDF version of this industrial hygiene report, click here.
For additional information, please contact Sentry Air Systems, Inc.